More Cake Parking

Image from ITDP-Europe

Image from ITDP-Europe

The owner of Cake Love is on the record wanting more parking for businesses on U Street.  Many folks commenting on his blog (myself included) are trying to convince him otherwise.  Warren followed up on his comments on August 3:

I understand and really like the density argument: more people walking will bring success for street level retail shops, these are my core customers, and traffic robs a neighborhood of potential. A lot of the customers that shop in Mid-city are walkers, but not everyone, and this city doesn’t have the density of Manhattan everywhere. Do we really need 1,500 new parking spots, probably not, but couldn’t the Mid-city merchants use more? I appreciate the feedback, but I invite people to ask other businesses if they could drop their driving customers as quickly as the mood suggests in the comments submitted. Drivers matter, too, for a urban environment to thrive.

The thing is, drivers do matter.  But urbanism is about playing to your core strengths and advantages, and no matter how you slice it, parking is not going to be the core advantage of an urban area.

Twin Cities Streets for People had a great post linking to a post from the Commercial District Advisor on parking and retail in urban environments, explaining the issues facing urban retail areas.

The other night my colleague and I were convening a merchant roundtable and started by distributing a questionnaire that asked the merchants to describe their typical customer. Things like where they come from, whey they shop in the district, what problems they see with the district…etc. Knowing your customer and responding to their needs and concerns is the foundation of a successful business. Unfortunately, many of the merchants in the room couldn’t answer some of these basic questions. This simple questionnaire pointed to a fundamental problem within the district – merchants cannot pinpoint the reasons why customers are choosing to spend their dollars elsewhere. Without this critical information, there is little that merchants can do to address the problems and improve the shopping experience for their customers.

What I found interesting about that meeting, but not too unusual, was the emphasis that merchants placed on the shortage of parking as the primary reason their businesses are suffering. The mood in the room was tense as merchants lashed out in frustration at the parking situation. Here’s the rub – two follow up roundtables with residents and district employees found that parking was in fact a MINOR concern. Their real concerns were related to the trash, litter, unappealing storefronts and ‘grimy’ interiors of stores…these were the real reasons that many hesitated to shop in the district. The disconnect between what merchants thought was the problem and what the customers actually said was the problem was amazing – and hopefully eye-opening for many of the merchants.

Everyone wants to help small businesses.  The thing is that what the businesses want isn’t exactly what’s best for either them or the city they inhabit.  We could all use a better understanding of exactly how urban transportation and retail markets work, particularly retailers.


2 Responses to “More Cake Parking”

  1. Christopher Says:

    I suspect Warren knows a little more about his customers. But regardless, I think he makes an error in believing them.

    I’m sure he talks to his customers at his Silver Spring and Tysons stores and asks them why they don’t come down to 14th and U. And they probably all say parking.

    Thing is?

    You build parking? They still wont come.

    Then it will be. Oh well. The traffic is so bad. And it takes so long to get there from X-Y-Z. So that’s the rub. He’s got a neighborhood business. And he wants it to be regional. And true, parking would probably help draw some customers. It wouldn’t be enough.

    And really, as someone that used to live in Petworth and regularly drove to 14th and U Street. Parking is NOT hard to find there. It’s rather insanely easy actually.

    U street could use improvement to make it LESS friendly to cars — narrow the travel lanes, widen the sidewalks. And really present itself as a ped-oriented environment.

  2. Alex Block Says:

    I didn’t mean to insue that Warren and other retailers don’t know anything about their customers, but that they don’t know the right things about customers in certain markets. As you note, Cake Love customers at their U Street store are a completely different market than the ones at their Tysons store.

    One-size-fits-all transportation planning is not the way to go.

    I agree on U Street. Instead of 4 lanes, if they were to go to three traffic lanes (one in each direction with a center left turn lane) that would give more room for sidewalks (which are cramped in some places) and bike lanes, improve traffic flow, and potentially make more room for on-street parking. Price that parking properly via some sort of performance parking mechanism, use that revenue to help improve the streetscape and keep the area clean, and we’ve got a winning framework.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: